Please Note: Froedtert Health has implemented a new security protocol which has resulted in the degradation of on-campus access to MCW Libraries' electronic resources. Users on the Froedtert network must sign in via OpenAthens when attempting to access electronic library resources (including UpToDate, VisualDx, etc.). MCW Libraries is aware of this change and is working to provide a permanent access solution. If you have MCW credentials, please sign in via MCW employees and students when prompted. If you are a Froedtert employee, click here to register for an OpenAthens account or view more information.
Work with a librarian on your next scoping review! Request an appointment to meet with us.
Need assistance with library resources or services? Ask a librarian! We are available via chat, email, phone or texting during staffed hours.
A scoping review is a study that aims "to map the literature on a particular topic or research area and provide an opportunity to identify key concepts; gaps in the research; and types and sources of evidence to inform practice, policymaking, and research."
Daudt HM, van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 23;13:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-48. PMID: 23522333; PMCID: PMC3614526.
Source: Munn, Z., Peters, M.D.J., Stern, C. et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 18,143 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x is licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http//creativecommons.org/licenses/by4.0)
| SCOPING REVIEW | SYSTEMATIC REVIEW |
| To identify the types of available evidence in a given field | Uncover the international evidence |
| To clarify key concepts/ definitions in the literature | Confirm current practice/ address any variation/ identify new practices |
| To examine how research is conducted on a certain topic or field | Identify and inform areas for future research |
| To identify key characteristics or factors related to a concept | Identify and investigate conflicting results |
| As a precursor to a systematic review | Produce statements to guide decision-making |
| To identify and analyze knowledge gaps |
Source: Munn, Z., Peters, M.D.J., Stern, C. et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 18,143 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x is licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http//creativecommons.org/licenses/by4.0)
Scoping reviews: what they are and how you can do them: videos from a Cochrane Learning Live Webinar. Presents an overview of scoping reviews and includes examples, steps of the scoping review process, and methods used in scoping reviews from the literature.
Rapid review - A rapid review is like an accelerated systematic review. It may take 2-4 months to complete. While it assesses the evidence, it lacks the rigor of a full systematic review.
Definitions for various types of reviews are available from Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009 Jun;26(2):91-108. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x. Review. PubMed PMID: 19490148
A meta-analysis uses statistical methods to combine information from a number of separate but similar studies and derive conclusions on that subject.
A literature review intends to provide an overview of a subject. It does not include a systematic search of the literature or a description of the methods used in the review and is sometimes based on author experience. These reviews may be subject to bias.
MCW Libraries
8701 Watertown Plank Road
Milwaukee, WI 53226
(414) 955-8300
Front desk: (414) 955-8300