Please Note: Froedtert Health has implemented a new security protocol which has resulted in the degradation of on-campus access to MCW Libraries' electronic resources. Users on the Froedtert network must sign in via OpenAthens when attempting to access electronic library resources (including UpToDate, VisualDx, etc.). MCW Libraries is aware of this change and is working to provide a permanent access solution. If you have MCW credentials, please sign in via MCW employees and students when prompted. If you are a Froedtert employee, click here to register for an OpenAthens account or view more information.
Work with a librarian on your next scoping review! Request an appointment to meet with us.
Need assistance with library resources or services? Ask a librarian! We are available via chat, email, phone or texting during staffed hours.
Systematized Reviews,"attempt to include one or more elements of the systematic review process while stopping short of...a systematic review. Systematized reviews are typically conducted as a postgraduate student assignment, in recognition they are not able to draw upon the resources required for a full systematic review (such as two reviewers)."
Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26(2):91-108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
The table below highlights the similarities and differences between Systematic, Scoping, and Systematized Reviews.
|
|
Systematic Review |
Scoping Review |
Systematized Review |
|
Search |
Aims for exhaustive, comprehensive searching |
Completeness of searching determined by time/scope constraints. May include research in progress |
May or may not include comprehensive searching
|
|
Appraisal |
Quality assessment may determine inclusion/exclusion |
No formal quality assessment |
May or may not include quality assessment |
|
Synthesis |
Typically, narrative with tabular accompaniment |
Typically, tabular with some narrative commentary |
Typically, narrative with tabular accompaniment |
|
Analysis |
What is known; recommendations for practice. What remains unknown; uncertainty around findings, recommendations for future research |
Characterizes quantity and quality of literature [not ASSESS] by study design & other key features. Attempts to specify a viable review. |
What is known; uncertainty around findings; limitations of methodology. |
|
Reporting Guidelines |
None (but may) |
Adapted from Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26(2):91-108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
MCW Libraries
8701 Watertown Plank Road
Milwaukee, WI 53226
(414) 955-8300
Front desk: (414) 955-8300